
Descent of Miss Pamela Knox
22nd from Edward III through his second son
21st “ “ “ “ “ third “
21st “ “ “ “ “ fourth “
20th “ “ “ “ “ fifth “
26th “ Edward I through Princess Joan
23rd “ “ “ “ “ Elizabeth
23rd “ “ “ “ Prince Thomas
23rd “ “ “ “ Prince Edward
25th Henry III
28th Henry II
24th Philip VIII of France
26th Louis VIII “ “
29th David I of Scotland
27th Llewellyn, Prince of Wales
24th Ferdinand VIII of Bastile
27th Alphonso VIII of Spain. |
Charles II was married to Catherine
of Braganza, daughter of the King of Portugal. He left no legitimate children,
but his unlawful progeny were the founders of four or five existing English
Dukedoms, as Richmond and Gordon, St. Albans and others
I think I went into the pedigree pretty fully to Monica so you will know
a good deal about it if you have seen the letter. Do tell me anything
you would especially like to know. This will I think be new to you.
This is something to ponder over! I have moved you on two
generations from Father who compiled the table.
The Coores trace back about two hundred years to an Alderman of Liverpool,
perhaps not quite the most illustrious line in our descents!
The last Henry George may be called our Duke. All the brothers married
but none of them left any children, but besides the three brothers there
were four daughters of whom the 3rd Augusta Henrietta married Mark Milbank
and was my great grandmother and your great great grandmother.
Now Miss Pamela Knox I think you will see exactly where
we all come in. When the first Duke died in 1891 all his honours became
extinct except the Barony of Barnard, The Duke left his great castle and
estate of Raby (a Vane inheritance) to whoever could prove his title to
the Barony of Barnard. The man who did was rather vaguely described as
the Duke’s kinsman. There was as a matter of fact some doubt about
the validity of the marriage of an ancestor of the man who is now Lord
Barnard. However this was established to the satisfaction of a Law Court
and he inherited the title and estate. One third of the Ducal possessions
passed to the descendant of the elder sister of our great or great great
grandmother; one third to the grandson of Lady Augusta and Mark Milbank
and Raby and the title to Lord Barnard. |
|
Conyers DARCY (4° B. Conyers of Hornby / B. Darcy of Knaith)Conyers
DARCY
(4th B. Conyers of Hornby / B. Darcy of Knaith)
Died: 3 Mar 1653
Father: Thomas DARCY
Mother: Elizabeth CONYERS
Married: Dorothy BELLASIS (b. ABT 1572, Newborough, Yorkshire - d. 11
May 1653)
(dau. of Henry Belassis (Sir) and Ursula Fairfax)
Children:
1. Barbara DARCY (m. Matthew Hutton)
2. Ursula DARCY (m. Christopher Woodville)
3. Conyers DARCY (1° E. Holderness)
4. Elizabeth DARCY (m. Sir Henry Stapleton)
5. James DARCY (Hon.) (m. Isabel Woodville)


|
|
|
Son and heir of Thomas Darcy of Hornby Castle, by
Elizabeth, 2nd daughter and coheir of John, Lord Conyers, became in Jul
1635, on the death of his cousin, John, Lord Darcy, his heir male, as
also heir male of his great-grandfather, Thomas, Lord Darcy (attainted
1538); and being maternally, through the Conyers family, a coheir of John,
Lord Darcy, sum. by writ in 1331/2, set out these facts in a petition
to the King in the Parliament which first met at Westminster, 3 Nov 1640,
wherein he asked that the King might "be pleased to declare, restore,
and confirm, to him the said Sir Conyers Darcy and the Heirs Male of his
body, the stile, title and dignity of Lord Darcy". Two Patents which
issued on 10 and 12 Aug 1641 respectively, are held to have determined
the abeyance of the ancient Barony of Darcy [and by inference that of
Conyers] in his favour, whereby he became Baron Darcy (of Knaith) [1344]
and Baron Conyers [1509], both baronies being held in fee. Conyers Darcy,
son and heir of Thomas Darcy, co. York (jure uxoris), Lieut. of the Tower
of London, died 6 Nov 1605), by his 1st wife, Elizabeth (d. 6 Jun 1572),
2nd daughter and coheir of John Conyers, Lord Conyers, last abovenamed,
was born in York, and bap. at St. Michael le Belfry, 27 Aug 1570; admitted
Fellow Commoner Caius Coll.
Cambridge, 10 Dec 1588, and then said to be aged 17. He
was knighted 23 Jul 1603, and resided at Hornby Castle, co. York, the
inheritance of his maternal ancestors. In the Parl. which first met at
Westminster 3 Nov 1640, he petitioned the King for the restoration to
him of the dignity of Baron Darcy. On 2 Aug 1641 a Royal Warrant directed
the preparation of two bills to restore to him the ancient liberties,
places, and states of John, Lord Darcy, and of John, Lord Conyers, and
accordingly two signed bills issued on 10 Aug and 12 Aug 1641 respectively,
the former stating that Conyers Darcy Knight is to be Lord Darcy, and
the latter that Conyers Darcy Knight, Lord Darcy, is to be Lord Conyers,
with in both cases Declaration and Confirmation of the said dignities
to him and the heirs male of his body. He was summoned to Parl. 28 Oct
1641, taking his seat 20 Jan 1641/2, as "Lord Darcy and Conyers"
under "his Patent of Restitution and creation and his Writ of summons,"
when he was placed next below Lord Dacre On 13 Jul 1644, by the extinction
of the issue of the other coheirs, he became the representative of his
maternal grandfather, and consequently, according to modern doctrine,
became de jure Lord Conyers [1509]. Previous to the determination of the
abeyance of the Barony of Darcy in 1903, the Committee for Privileges
decided that the effect of the signed bills referred to above was to terminate
the abeyance of the ancient Barony of Darcy [and by inference that of
Conyers]. It is held therefore that he became Baron Darcy (of Knayth)
[1344] and Baron Conyers [1509], both baronies being held in fee. He married
(lic. 1594) Dorothy, daughter of Sir Henry Bellasis, 1st Bart., of Newborough,
co. York, by Ursula, daughter of Sir Thomas Fairfax of Denton, co. York.
She was buried 11 May 1653, at Hornby. He died, and was buried there 6
Mar 1653/4, aged 83to Bios Page to Family Pageto Peerage Page to Home
Page |